Tag Archives: Couldn’t have said it better

Martin Luther King, Jr., on the Montgomery Bus Boycott

From Stride Toward Freedom:

During the rush hours the sidewalks were crowded with laborers and domestic workers, many of them well past middle age, trudging patiently to their jobs and home again, sometimes as much as twelve miles. They knew why they walked, and the knowledge was evident in the way they carried themselves. And as I watched them I knew that there is nothing more majestic than the determined courage of individuals willing to suffer and sacrifice for their courage and dignity.

Respect to those who came before, including (and especially) Dr. King himself. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to celebrate his birthday (and mine) by raising my voice in support of peace and justice.

Carrots and sticks, part III

Let’s get the stick out of the way first. From our friend Mr. Singer:

Stick

Guess those muscle cars Detroit is so fond of haven’t been doing the trick.

And now, the good stuff:

From a recent American Public Transportation Association study:

• Public transportation usage reduces U.S. gasoline consumption by 1.4 billion gallons each year – or the equivalent of 108 million cars filling up, almost 300,000 each day. These savings result from the efficiency of carrying multiple passengers in each vehicle; the reduction in traffic congestion from fewer automobiles on the roads; and the varied sources of energy for public transportation.

• Households that are likely to use public transportation on a given day save over $6,200 every year, compared to a household with no access to public transportation service. These households have two workers, one car and are within three-quarters of a mile of public transportation.

For those of you who aren’t ready to go cold turkey: This study proves you don’t have to give up driving altogether to make a difference–to the world and your own bank account.

For the details, check out APTA’s full report.

Going car-free: the quick and dirty

Since early November, I’ve devoted my Real Change column to a series of how-to articles for people who want to give up their cars. So far, I’ve written five, and I’ve barely scratched the surface. After all, there’s a lot to say; Chris Balish wrote an entire book on the subject.

Yesterday, I found wikiHow, a wiki site with a how-to focus. Lo and behold–they have useful and informative one-pager about going car free: “How to Live without a Car.” Here’s a taste:

Living without a car can be pretty tough, especially in the U.S., where public transportation is frequently lacking and where questionable urban planning has caused the average person to live far away from workplaces, schools, and markets. That said, it’s certainly possible, as long as you’re willing to change your lifestyle. Some of the suggestions below are easy for anybody, while others require more sacrifice. The sacrifice, however, may benefit you immensely once you consider the staggering cost of owning a vehicle …

The rest of the article is a list of basic steps you should take and tools you will need to find success living without a car. It ain’t perfect (I don’t, for example, agree that you need “a friend [who is] willing to drive you around”), but it’s a doggone good start.

More fun articles on wikiHow:

How to Ride a Public Transportation Bus
How to Remain Standing While Riding a Bus
How to Ride the Bus Safely and Enjoy Yourself

The quality of articles can hardly compete with those on Wikipedia, mostly because this site doesn’t have nearly the number of eyeballs on it. Still, it’s cool that folks are putting this information out there. Perhaps you experienced riders might want to share some of your expertise. When I get a moment, I’m going to.

Speaking of suburbs…

From BusinessWeek:

A new report from the Washington-based Center for Housing Policy finds that in major metropolitan regions around the country, the money you save on housing by moving away from the city is about the same amount you will spend on additional transportation costs.

And this:

Frequently, families that move away from cities such as San Francisco fail to prepare for the high cost of the car culture they enter. “Transportation means not only going to work, but if you’re living in one of the outlying suburbs, it means you need a car to do absolutely everything,” says Barbara Lipman, the research director for the report. “I think it’s important to consider your total costs.”

In this week’s Real Change column, which is about the importance of location to a successful car-free life, I also touch on the issue:

If you’re settling for a sidewalkless suburb with spread-out strip malls and hourly bus service because you think it’s cheaper, consider this: According to the American Automobile Association, the total annual cost (including gas, insurance, parking, maintenance, and depreciation) for an average mid-sized sedan in 2004 was $8,410. If you move to a transit-friendly neighborhood, you can drop that expensive habit. Spend $700 for an annual Metro pass, throw in another $700 for fare upgrades, Flexcar rentals, and occasional cabs, and you’ve still got an extra $7,000–almost $600 per month–to contribute to higher housing costs.

A busless Sunday

Today was a blissful zero; I didn’t even leave my house. This afforded me the time to watch an old movie (the original Terminator–Bus Nerd’s idea) and this old-school video. If you don’t want to play it, here’s what you need to know:

Sach: “Yusef won’t you tell me where the honeys is at?”
Yusef: “They on bus stops … “

Sadly, the bus chick pick-up artist is one of the few who is aware (and taking advantage) of this phenomenon. Fellas: Don’t let him win due to lack of competition.

The Zone(ing) diet

On Wednesday, Streetsblog linked to this article by Richard Jackson, author of Urban Sprawl and Public Health. Some excerpts:

The message of the book is simple: our car-dependent suburban environment is killing us. Planners, most notably the New Urbanists, have been saying this for decades, but Jackson’s got the statistics. And the charts. And the tables. In his book and in lectures nationwide, Jackson demonstrates–technically, like a doctor–how sprawl is at least partially responsible for a full range of American diseases, from asthma to diabetes, from hypertension to depression. The reason that we spend one dollar out of six on health care is very preventable, and yet we claim some of the worst health statistics in the developed world.

You say, “The modern America of obesity, inactivity, depression, and loss of community has not ‘happened’ to us. We legislated, subsidized, and planned it this way.” When did you first start to make the connection between the design of our national landscape and the health of our citizens?
In July 1999 the head of the CDC invited his dozen directors to the central office to work on a paper about the ten leading diseases of the twenty-first century. I’m driving over there, and as always I’m thinking about pesticides, herbicides, cancer, and birth-defect clusters–you name it. I’m late, stuck in traffic on Buford Highway, voted one of the ten worst streets in North America. It’s a seven-lane road surrounded by garden apartments, mainly for poor immigrants, with no sidewalks and two miles between traffic lights. It’s 95 degrees out, 95 percent humidity. I see a woman on the right shoulder, struggling along, and she reminds me of my mother. She’s in her seventies, with reddish hair and bent over with osteoporosis. She has a shopping bag in each hand and is really struggling.

I lived in Houston, Texas for eight years. I loved many things about the H, but its build environment was not one of them. Consistently one of the fattest cities in the country, it is also (not coincidentally) one of the most sprawling and car-centric. (Of course, the amazing food might also be a contributing factor. What I wouldn’t give for a taste of boudin right about now. But I digress.) Sidewalks are rare, roads are wide, and strip malls abound. It’s hard to get anywhere in Houston (grocery store, drug store, library, park, cafe–shoot, even the bus stop) walking, and those brave enough to attempt it are often forced into ditches at the side of the road.

On the other hand, it’s 85 degrees there today.

Defense wins championships

David Whitley, a sportswriter at the Orlando Sentinel has had enough of the “thrown under a bus” (as in, “He didn’t want to take the blame for the loss, so he threw his teammates under the bus.”) cliché. Whitley would like everyone–not just athletes–to give it a rest, already.

The Bus-Throw is slang for unfair criticism, usually for personal gain. As far as descriptions go, it certainly makes the point.

“Considering buses weigh 25,000 pounds, we do not recommend anyone be thrown under one,” said Bill Fay, communications specialist for Lynx.

The phrase offers an outstanding visual. And like cliches, it was clever the first two dozen times you heard it.

But eventually all cliches stop taking them one game at a time so they circle the wagons and throw out the record books and feel like kissing your sister so much that even John Madden stops using them.

Besides, Whitley wants to know, why is the bus so unfairly targeted?

Why not throw people under a car or a steamroller or John Daly? There were 77 deaths nationwide from bus accidents in 2004, the most recent year on record. That pales in comparison to the number of people run over by cars, motorcycles, bicycles and runaway shopping carts.

It appears, at least to this bus chick, that the hardworking (and underappreciated) form of transportation has somehow managed to get thrown under itself.

Speaking of California…

Los Angeles has a bus riders’ union. Though they might want to consider narrowing down their mission statement, I like what they’re about:

The Bus Riders Union seeks to promote environmentally sustainable public transportation for the entire population of Los Angeles, on the premise that affordable, efficient, and environmentally sound mass transit is a human right.

They clearly recognize both the environmental and social-justice benefits of public transit, which is rare; most transit advocates seem to focus on one or the other. (Of course, there are also urban-planning and public-health benefits, which you could argue fit into one of the above categories. I like to call them out. But I digress.)

LA’s Bus Riders Union must be doing something right, because they managed to attract the attention of an Oscar-winning filmmaker. Apparently, in 1999, Haskell Wexler directed a documentary about the organization, which I have yet to get my hands on. I’ll report back as soon as I do.

Finding a man on the CTA

The folks at Boystowners share a story about a successful bus mack (which, it seems, has resulted in some good, old fashioned bus luh):

We’ve all heard stories about the CTA, the cramped morning commutes, late buses/trains and obnoxious riders. Have you ever heard of falling in love?

It happened for two lucky Boystown residents (they’re now in Wicker Park) on the No. 146-Inner Drive/Michigan Express from downtown to Belmont…

Their advice for finding love on the CTA:

One: Be open to meeting people on the “L” or bus. If you’re not, you could miss out on a new friend or a possible love match.

Two: If you do find love, even if it’s at a bus stop, hold on to it

They always say you’ll find love where you least expect it. We better remember to do our hair the next time we ride the bus.

Don’t make me say I told you so.